<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://pl.tauriworld.com/tauripedia/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Tauripedia - Wkład użytkownika [pl]</title>
		<link>http://pl.tauriworld.com/tauripedia/index.php?title=Specjalna:Wk%C5%82ad/0%3A0%3A0%3AFFFF%3A82%3A193%3A109%3A221</link>
		<description>Z Tauripedia</description>
		<language>pl</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.1</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 07:42:28 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>Plik:Ab.gif</title>
			<link>http://pl.tauriworld.com/tauripedia/index.php?title=Plik:Ab.gif</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;0:0:0:FFFF:82:193:109:221:&amp;#32;XXSputELyMP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In the grand pattern of tnhgis you'll receive  an A+ for hard work. Where you confused us ended up being in the specifics. You know,  they say, details make or break the argument.. And that couldn't be much more correct in this article. Having said that, let me inform you just what did deliver the results. Your authoring is definitely pretty powerful and that is most likely why I am making the effort in order to opine. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. 2nd, while I can easily see a leaps in reasoning you make, I am definitely not convinced of just how you appear to connect the ideas which help to make the conclusion. For the moment I will yield to your point but wish in the future you actually connect your facts much better.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 22:19:17 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>0:0:0:FFFF:82:193:109:221</dc:creator>			<comments>http://pl.tauriworld.com/tauripedia/index.php?title=Dyskusja_pliku:Ab.gif</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>